The Appletonian brings us up to speed on Justice Ziegler, her critics, and her ethical standards.
Ziegler's critics ignore that any issue she may have had was well known by the electorate before they chose her because that would mean voters judged (correctly, I think) her minor ethical infractions insignificant compared to their more substantial misgivings over the philosophy and relative inexperience of Ziegler's opponent.
Since her election, were it discovered Ziegler was curing the blind and healing the lame, her critics would wonder if she was unfit to judge any case involving BadgerCare.
